Genuine versus pseudo innovation
Innovation Leadership Series | Online events
Because most larger corporations are not achieving any breakthroughs yet, terms like incremental innovation, gradual innovation, or architectural innovation have been formed to not look too bad. But let’s be honest – that is an equally terrible excuse for not being innovative, as having an innovation center that is more like a playground than anything else.
Every day you accept that incremental innovation is ok to start somehow in the innovation space, you not only lose a day but your team is weakening their career and the market loses interest in your innovation effort.
Online Event
EU/ASIA
Wed. Nov 9, 2022
09:00 – 10:00 GMT (UK)
10:00 – 11:00 CEST (Europe)
16:00 – 17:00 ICT (Vietnam)
17:00 – 18:00 SST (Singapore)
18:00 – 19:00 KST (Korea)
[su_button url=”https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_FBWNk9YtRdGDzJiTqjHq_Q” target=”blank” background=”#ee0f10″ size=”5″ center=”no” icon=”icon: check” icon_color=”#fff”]Get your event access key[/su_button]
Even if you can’t join now, you may want to register in order to get the recording.
* Genuine innovation is always a breakthrough. Hence a disruptive or breakthrough innovation.
* Incremental innovation is a misleading term for improvement, which is far from being an innovation.
It’s time to make some clear definitions and some clear decisions.
1) What describes a breakthrough / disruptive / genuine innovation?
2) What does it mean to go after a real innovation versus improvement?
3) What are the economic, organizational and strategic differences?
4) How is innovation a business strategy and improvement just a normal activity?
5) How to start becoming genuinely innovative and start going after breakthroughs?
6) What is the impact on the team side, leadership, board and capital markets?
TAKEAWAY
Every day you accept that incremental innovation is ok to start somehow in the innovation space, you not only lose a day but your team is weakening their career and the market loses interest in your innovation effort.
Axel Schultze |
Philippe Theis |